Thursday, May 2, 2013

អា​យ៉ៃ​ឆ្លើយឆ្លង​រវាង សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​-​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ កើត​ជំងឺ​ភ្លេច​សំដី​ខ្លួនឯង​ (ភាគទី០១)


បុព្វបុរស​ខ្មែរ​បាន​ ចងក្រង​នូវ​ច្បាប់​ទូន្មាន​ជា​ច្រើន​សម្រាប់​ដាស់តឿន​ ក្រើន​រំលឹក​ដល់មនុស្ស​ជំនាន់​ក្រោយ​ កុំឱ្យ​ភ្លេច​ស្មារតី​ នាំ​ឱ្យ​ខូច​កិត្ដិយស​ ស្អុយ​កេរ្ដិ៍ឈ្មោះ​ ដោយសារ​អំពើ​ដែល​ខ្លួន​បាន​សាង​ ។​ ពាក្យ​ថា​ « រនាប​បាក់​យក​រនាប​ជួស សម្តី​ហួស​គ្មាន​អ្វី​ជួស​​បាន​ »​ គឺជា​បំណង​ដ៏​ល្អ​បំផុត​សម្រាប់​ ដាស់​ស្មារតី​ដល់​អ្នកនយោបាយ​ខ្មែរ​ដែល​ និយម​ប្រើ​វោហារ​អួតអាង​ កាង​សម្ដី​ ឱ្យ​ងាក​មក​ប្រកាន់ពាក្យ​សច្ចៈ​វិញ​ ។​ តាម​ន័យ​នេះ​ក្នុង​សង្គម​ខ្មែរ​បច្ចុប្បន្ន​ លោក​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ត្រូវ​គេ​មើលឃើញ​ថា​ ជា​ជើងឯក​ខាង​អួត​ និយាយ​ក្រឡេចក្រឡុច​ មិន​អាច​យក​ជា​ការ​បាន​។​ ជាក់ស្ដែង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​និយាយ​ប្រាប់​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​គណបក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ពី​ភាព​ក្រឡេចក្រឡុច​របស់​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ដោយ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ អះអាង​ថា​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ក្បត់​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ក្នុង​រឿង​ចូល​ប្រជុំ​សភា​ជា​លើក​ដំបូង​ បន្ទាប់​ពី​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​អាណត្ដិ​ទី​៤​ហើយ​ ដូច​ជា​ពាក្យ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ លើក​ឡើង​ថា« យើង​អស្ចារ្យ​ យើង​បង្កើត​គណបក្ស​តែ​មួយឆ្នាំ​ទេ​មុន​បោះឆ្នោត​ យើង​បាន​ជិត​ ៤០​ម៉ីន​​សម្លេង​ទូទាំង​ប្រទេស ហើយ​ខាង​ប្រឆាំងនោះ​ដើរលាបពណ៌​យើង​ ដើរបង្ខូចយើងថា​ ពួកយើង​ជាអាយ៉ង​គេ​ ដើរ​ចោទថា​ លក់​ខ្លួន​ឲ្យ​គេ​ ស្រាប់តែដល់​បោះឆ្នោត​ហើយ ​​យើង​ថា​បោះ​​ឆ្នោត​ហ្នឹង​អត់ត្រឹម​ត្រូវ​ទេ​ អត់​ចូលប្រជុំ​ទេ​ ថា​អត់ចូលទាំងអស់គ្នា​។ ស្រាប់​តែ​អ្នក​​ថា​​​យើង​អាយ៉ង​ ចូលប្រូច​ ឯឯង​អាយ៉ង​នេះ​អត់​ចូល​ ឥឡូវ​អាណា​អាយ៉ង​អញ្ចឹង​ ដូច្នេះ​បងប្អូនឃើញទេ​ អ្នក​ចោទយើង​ថា​អាយ៉ង​ បែរជាចូលប្រជុំ​​ប្រូច​ ដាក់​កន្ទុយ​ចូល​ឃ្វៀន​ »​​
 
          ជា​ការ​ពិត​ណាស់​ ទាំង​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ទាំង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ សុទ្ធតែ​ធ្លាប់​ជួប​សន្ទនា​ដោយ​សម្ងាត់​ ជាមួយសម្តេច​អគ្គមហាសេនា​បតី​តេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន ​ ហេតុនេះ​ទើប​អា​យ៉ង​ទាំង​២​ ស៊ីសាច់ហុតឈាម​គ្នា​ដណ្ដើម​យកឈ្មោះ​ ជា​អ្នក​កៀក​កិត​បំផុត​ នឹង​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ដោយ​បិទ​បាំង​ពី​ភ្នែក​ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ​ ។​ ករណី​នេះ​​ហើយ​ទើប​យើង​ឃើញ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ថា សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ជា​អា​យ៉ង​ ចំណែក​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ បាន​បញ្ជាក់​យ៉ាង​ច្បាស់​ថា​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​អា​យ៉ង​របស់​អា​យ៉ង​ គឺ​អា​យ៉ង​២​ជាន់​ ប្រហែលជា​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ចង់​បញ្ជាក់​ថា​ បើ​ខ្លួន​គាត់​ (​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​)​ជា​ អា​យ៉ង​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ទៅ​ហើយ​ តើ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ធ្វើ​ជា​ អា​យ៉ង​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ អ្វី​ទៀត​ មាន​ន័យ​ថា​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​អា​យ៉ង​របស់​អា​យ៉ង ​យ៉ាង​ពិតប្រាកដ​ ។​ មិន​ខុស​អី​នឹង​សម្ដី​ដែល​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ធ្លាប់​បញ្ជាក់​ថា« គណបក្ស​តូចតាច គណបក្ស​​ទើប​បង្កើត​​ក្រោយ​នោះ និងជាគណបក្ស​គេចិញ្ចឹម​ គេបង្កើត​ជាដៃជើង​គេ​ ជាអាយ៉ង​គេ​ អាយ៉ង​របស់​អាយ៉ង​ អាយ៉ង​២ជាន់ណា​បងប្អូន​។ បង​ប្អូន​គួរ​តែវិនិច្ឆ័យ​ ថាគណបក្ស​ណា​ ការពារ​ប្រជារាស្ត្រ​ កុំគ្រាន់​តែ​លើក​និយាយល្អម្សិលមិញ​ ទើប​តែ​ចាប់​ផ្តើម​ពី​ឆ្នាំ​ទៅ​ នោះ​គឺ​មិនមែន​ទេបងប្អូន​​ ត្រូវ​មើល​ទង្វើ​ ការ​តស៊ូ​ដែលគណបក្ស​ សម រង្ស៊ី តស៊ូ​ គឺ ១២ឆ្នាំ​ហើយដែល​ហ៊ាន​ចេញមុខ​ប្រឆាំង​​ » ។​

          ចំណែក​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ឆ្លើយ​តប​នឹង​ពាក្យ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ វិញ​ទាំង​ញ័រ​មាត់​ញ័រ​ក​ចំពោះ​សេចក្ដី​ពន្យល់​របស់​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ខាង​លើ​នេះ​ ដោយ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​ចាត់​ទុក​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ជា​ខ្មែរក្រហម​ និង​ជា​សម្ដី​សម្លាប់​ជីវិត​នយោបាយ​របស់ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ។​ ព្រឹត្ដិ​ការណ៍​នេះ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ចង់​ប្រាប់​ទៅ​សកម្ម​ជន​គណបក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ថា​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ជា​មនុស្ស​ដែល​មិន​អាច​ទុកចិត្ដ​បាន​ទេ​និង​មិន​ដែល​គោរព​ពាក្យ​សន្យា​ម្ដងណា​ឡើយ​។​ដូច​ជាពាក្យ​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ធ្លាប់​និយាយ​ថា« គេថា​គណបក្ស​សិទ្ធិមនុស្ស​ ហ៊ុន សែន បង្កើត​ ប៉ុន្តែ​ គោលបំណង​គណបក្ស សិទ្ធិមនុស្ស​ដើម្បី​ដូរ ហ៊ុន សែន​ ចេញ​ បើគេ​បង្កើត​ដើម្បី​ដូរគេ​ ក៏ព្រមដែរ​ » ។​​​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ទៀត​ថា​ “​បើ​ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ អ្នក​បង្កើត​ ចុះ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​ ហើយ​ ម៉េច​ក៏​គណបក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​មិន​គាំទ្រ​លទ្ធផល​បោះ​ឆ្នោតហ្នឹង​?​ ម៉េច​ក៏​​ប្រឆាំង​លទ្ធផល​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​ហ្នឹង​?​ ប្រឆាំង​ហើយ​គេ​ហៅ​ចូល​ប្រជុំ​ ម៉េច​ក៏​អត់​​ចូល​ប្រជុំ​ ដូច្នេះ​អាហ្នឹង​គេ​ឱ្យ​ បង្កើត​ឬ​អត់?​​ ករណី​នេះ​កូន​ក្មេង​ក៏វា​​ចេះ​គិត​ដែរ​។​ដូច្នេះ​សម្ដី​នេះ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ បាន​ ដើរ​លាប​ពណ៌​គ្នា​​ អត់​ខុស​ពី​ខ្មែរក្រហម​ទេ​ ខ្មែរ​ក្រហម​​ដើរ​លាប​ពណ៌ ថា​អានេះ​ សេអ៊ីអា អានេះ កាហ្សេបេ ដើម្បី​ខុស​យក​ទៅ​សម្លាប់​ ដូច្នេះ​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​ដែរ​ទេ?​​ បើ​ដើរ​លាប​ពណ៌​គេបែបនេះ​។​​ សូម​ឈប់​ទៅ​អា​ល្បែង​ដើរ​លាប​ពណ៌​គេ​ វា​អា​លាយ​ខ្លួនឯង​ទេ​ សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​អត់​ អា​លាយ​ទេ​ មាសទឹកដប់​អត់​ខ្លាច​ភ្លើង​ទេ​ ”​ ។​ 

          មិនតែប៉ុណ្ណោះ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​ផ្ញើ​សារ​ជា​បន្ទាន់​មួយ​ទៅ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ឱ្យ​ឈប់​លើកយក​ការ​ពិត​មក​និយាយ​ក្នុង​ទី​សា​ធា​រ​ណៈ​ជា​បន្ទាន់​ បើ​មិន​ឈប់​ទេ​ រឿងអាស្រូវ​ របស់​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ជា​ច្រើន​នឹង​ត្រូវ​ទម្លាយ​ ។​ នេះ​បើ​តាម​ការ​បញ្ជាក់​របស់​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ “ដូច្នេះ​ហើយ អ្នក​ដែលថា​ហ្នឹង​ ក្រែង​លោ​ៗ ជិត​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​ប្រយ័ត្ន​ បើ​នៅ​តែ​ថា​អញ្ចឹង​​ ទៀត​ ប្រយ័ត្ន​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បញ្ចេញ​មានរឿង​ ខ្លះ​ នេះ​គ្រាន់តែ​ប្រាប់​ឱ្យ​ដឹង​មុន​ទេ​”​ ។​

          ឆ្លង​តាម​សម្ដី​មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ទាំង ​២​នេះ​ បញ្ជាក់​ឱ្យ​ឃើញ​ថា​ ពុំ​នោល « ​​រនាប​បាក់​​​យក​រនាប​ជួស​ សម្ដី​ហួស​គ្មាន​អ្វី​ជួស​បាន »​ ​ពិត​ជា​មាន​តម្លៃ​ជា​សកល​សម្រាប់​​ការ​អប់រំ​មនុស្ស​ឱ្យ​ចេះ​ប្រយ័ត្ន​សម្ដី​ ។​ ដូច​ករណី​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​លើក​ឡើង​ថា​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ជា​មនុស្ស​មិន​ស្មោះត្រង់​ ។​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ មាន​រឿង​ស្អុយរលួយ​ច្រើន​ដែល​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជួយលាក់​។ ​ ឯ​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ បាន​លើក​ឡើង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​មនុស្ស​ក្រឡេចក្រឡុច​ ជា​ដៃជើង​ និង​ជា​កូន​បក្ស​តូច​មួយ​ដែល​គណបក្ស​ប្រជាជន​កម្ពុជា ​ចិញ្ចឹម​ ។​ ទាំងនេះ​គឺជា​សម្ដី​របស់​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ និង​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ដែល​បាន​និយាយ​ កាលពី​ឆ្នាំ​២០០៨​ តែ​ពេល​នេះ​ទាំង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ទាំង​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ កំពុង​តែ​បំភ្លេច​សម្ដី​របស់​ខ្លួន​ដែល​បាន​បន្លឺ​ឡើង​ក្ដែ​ងៗ​នៅ​ ចំពោះ​មុខ​ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ​ តើ​បងប្អូន​អាច​ជឿជាក់​លើ​សម្ដី​របស់​មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ ទាំងនេះ​បន្ដ​ទៀត​ឬ​យ៉ាងណា​?​

          តាម​ពិត​ មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ទាំង​២​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ក្ដី​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ក្ដី​ សុទ្ធតែ​ជា​មនុស្ស​ ស៊ី​លៀស​រអៀសខ្លួន​ ព្រោះ​អ្នក​ទាំង​២ ​ពិត​ជា​បាន​ប្រាស្រ័យ​ទាក់ទង​ជាមួយ​សម្ដេច​ អគ្គមហាសេនាបតី​តេ​ជោ​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ យ៉ាង​ពិតប្រាកដ​ ។​ មិន​ខុស​អ្វី​ពី​ពុំ​នោល​បុរាណ​ពោល​ថា​ “​គោ​ដំបៅ​ខ្នង​ ក្អែក​ហើរ​ រំលង​រំសាយកន្ទុយ​”​ នោះ​ឡើយ​ ។​ ការ​ចង្អុល​ដាក់​គ្នា​ទៅ​វិញ​ទៅ​មក​របស់​មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ទាំង​២​ បាន​ក្លាយជា​ប្រធាន​បទ​ដ៏​សំខាន់​មួយ​សម្រាប់​​​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ទាំង​សងខាង​ ។​ អ្នកគាំទ្រ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ មើលឃើញ​យ៉ាង​ច្បាស់​ថា​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ គឺជា​អា​យ៉ង​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ដោយ​ ហេតុ​ថា​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ត្រូវ​បាន​សម្ដេច​ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ អនុគ្រោះ​ទោស​កំហុស​ជា​ច្រើន​លើក ​ច្រើន​សា​រ​ ។​

          ការ​ខំ​លាង​ជម្រះ​ឱ្យ​ស្អាត​ពី​ពាក្យ ​ថា​ អា​យ៉ង​ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ របស់​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ និង​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​ច្រាន​មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ទាំង​២​ ធ្លាក់​ក្នុង​ភាព​ប្រកាប់ប្រចាក់​គ្នា​ចាប់ពី​ ថ្នាក់លើ​ដល់​ថ្នាក់​មូលដ្ឋាន​ ដោយសារ​ការ​រីក​រាលដាល​នូវ​អំពើ​អនាធិបតេយ្យ​ នៅ​តាម​ភូមិ​ ស្រុក​មួយ​ចំនួន​រហូត​កើត​មាន​អំពើ​ហិង្សា​ផង​នោះ​  សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ប្រមុខ​គណបក្ស​ប្រជាជន​កម្ពុជា​បាន​លាត​ ត្រដាង​ការ​ពិត​នូវ​ ទំនាក់ទំនង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជាមួយ​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ក្នុង​ន័យ​សុំ​ឱ្យ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ហ៊ាន​ទទួលស្គាល់​ការ​ពិត​និង​ ជា​សារ​ជូន​ដល់​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ថា​អ្វី​ ដែល​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ និយាយ​នោះ​មិនជា​ខុស​ នោះ​ទេ​ ។​

          សម្ដេច​បាន​បញ្ជាក់​យ៉ាង​ដូច្នេះ​ថា​ “​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ មក​សួរ​យោបល់​ខ្ញុំ​ថា​ តើ​ឱ្យ​បន្ដ​ធ្វើ​NGO​ទៅ​​ទៀត​ ឬ​បង្កើត​បក្ស​ន​យោ​បាយ​?​ អញ្ចឹ​ង​សំណើ​សួរ​បែប​នេះ តើ​ខ្ញុំ​ឆ្លើយ​ថា​ម៉េច?​​ ខ្ញុំ​មិន​អាច​បដិសេធ​បាន​ទេ​ គាត់​សួរ​ខ្ញុំ​តាម​រយៈ​នៃ​អាជ្ញាកណ្ដាល​មួយ​ គាត់​សួរ​ថា​ តើ​ឱ្យ​គាត់​បន្ដ​ធ្វើ​អង្គការ​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​តទៅ​ទៀត ​ឬ​ក៏​បង្កើត​បក្ស​ន​យោ​បាយ?​​ ចម្លើយ​របស់ខ្ញុំ​ បើ​ខ្ញុំ​ឆ្លើយ​ថា​ ឱ្យ​គាត់​ធ្វើ​NGO​ មិន​ឱ្យធ្វើ​បក្សនយោបាយ​ ដូច​ជា​ខ្លាច​គាត់​ អញ្ចឹ​ង​​​ពេល​នោះ​ ខ្ញុំ​ឆ្លើយ​ គួរ​ធ្វើ​បក្សនយោបាយ​តែ​ម្ដង​ទៅ​ បាន​វាត​ភាគ ​ត​រឿង ​ត​រ៉ាវ​ ហើយ​គាត់​មួយ​ភាគ​ ធ្វើការ​ជាមួយ​ឯកឧត្ដម​ ញឹ​ម​ វណ្ណ​ដា​ គាត់​មួយ​ភាគ​ធ្វើការ​ជាមួយ​ខ្ញុំ​អា​រឿង​បង្កើត​បក្ស​នេះ​”​ ។​

          បន្ទាប់​ពី​សម្ដេច​អគ្គមហាសេនាបតី​ តេ​ជោ​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ប្រមុខ​គណបក្ស​ប្រជា​ជន​កម្ពុជា​បាន​ធ្វើ​សេចក្ដី​បញ្ជាក់​ពី​ទំនាក់​ ទំនង​ដ៏​ស៊ីជម្រៅ​រួច​មក​ គណបក្ស​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ បាន​យក​ប្រសាសន៍​សម្ដេច​តេ​ជោ​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ធ្វើ​ជាដើម​ទុន​សម្រាប់​វាយ​ប្រហារ​លើ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​ហេតុ​ធ្វើ​ឱ្យ​ គណបក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ មាន​ប្រៀប​លើ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ។​ ក្នុង​នោះ​ គង់​ គាំ​ អនុប្រធាន​គណ​បក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ដែល​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ហៅ​ថា​ អនុប្រធាន​ទីងមោង​ បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ពី​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​អា​យ៉ង​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ប្រាប់​ទៅ​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ យ៉ាង​ដូច្នេះ​ “​សម្ដេច​តេ​ជោ​គាត់​ថា​ ខា​អើយ​ខា​ សមាជ​ បើក​គណបក្ស​ខា​ឯង​ដែល​ខ្ញុំ​ជួយ​ស្ដា​តអូ​ឡាំ​ពិ​ក​នោះ​ជោគជ័យ​ល្អ​ណាស់​មែន​ទេ​?​ ​ ខា​ គេ​ឆ្លើយ​ថា​ បាទ​សម្ដេច​!​ សម្ដេច​នោះ​ ក៏​មាត់រអិល​ទៀត​ សួរ​ថា​អស់​លុយ​ប៉ុន្មាន?​  បើ​អត់​ជួយ​លុយ​គេ​ផង​ ចាំ​សួរ​ធ្វើ​អី?​​ លុយ​ហោប៉ៅ​គេ​សោះ​ ចង់​សួរ​គេ​ដែរ​ ។​ ដល់​មួយ​វគ្គ​ទៀត​ សម្ដេច​តេ​ជោ​ថា​ អើ​ ខា​ឯង​ មាន​បក្ស​ហើយ​ បក្ស​ខា​ឯង​ត្រូវ​អូស​ទាញ​ កម្លាំង​ពី​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ម៉ោ​ មើល​ប្រធាន​ខេត្ដ​ណា​ ខ្លាំងៗ ​របស់​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ទាញ​ម៉ោ​ ។​ដល់​នេះ​ ពេល​​ខា​សម្ភាសន៍​ជាមួយ​អាស៊ី​សេរី​ អញ្ចឹ​ង​មែន​ទេ​ លោក​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា? លោក កឹម សុខា ​ ថា​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ គំនិតអាក្រក់​តែម្តង​​ថត​ទុក។​​ខា​​ថា​ គាត់​មានគំនិត​អាក្រក់​គាត់​ចេះ​តែ​ថា​ទៅ​ ខ្ញុំ​ មាន​​អ៊ឺ​អើ​ជាមួយ​គាត់​ឯណា​...​ប៉ិន​មិន​អឺ​អើ​មែន​ ប៉ិន​លួច​ធ្វើ​តាម​សម្ដេច​យក​  ម៉ៅ​ មុនី​វណ្ណ​ ពី​គណបក្ស​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ទៅ​បាន​ហើយ​ សូម​រាយការណ៍​ ជូន​សម្ដេច​។​ មិន​បាន​ថា​ តែ​ធ្វើ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ធ្វើ​ហើយ​ឥឡូវ​ហ្នឹង​មើលចុះ​ អត់​មាន​មួល​បង្កាច់​ អត់​មាន​លាប​ពណ៌​អ្វី​ទេ​”​ ។​

          សេចក្ដី​បញ្ជាក់​របស់​ គង់​ គាំ​ ប្រៀប​ បាន​នឹង​យក​ដុំ​ភ្លើង​ទៅ​ញាត់​មាត់​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ឱ្យ​ឆេះ​រោលរាល​គ្មាន​អ្វី​ត្រូវ​ឆ្លើយ​តប​ ឬ​ពន្យល់​ទៅ​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​គណបក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ ឱ្យ​គេច​ផុត​ពី​ពាក្យ​ថា​អា​យ៉ង​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ និង​ដោយសារ​ គង់​ គាំ​ បាន​ច្រាន​ទ្រូង​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ផ្ទប់​នឹង​​ជញ្ជាំង​ទៅ​ហើយ ហើយ​​អ្វី​ដែល​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ត្រូវ​ដោះស្រាយ​នោះ​ តើ​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​អា​យ៉ង​សម្ដេច​ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ពិត​ឬ​មិន​ពិត​? ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បែរជា​ជេរ​ប្រមាថ​ គង់​ គាំ​ ថា​ជា​ទីងមោង​ មាន​ន័យ​ថា​ មនុស្ស​ល្ងង់ខ្លៅ​ និង​ជា​មនុស្ស​គេ​ ដាក់​កន្ដ្រក​ មាន​ន័យ​ថា​ ជា​ជន​បញ្ញើក្អែក​ ខ្ចី​ដង្ហើម​គេ​ដក​ ។​ 

សូម​ស្ដាប់​សេចក្ដី​បញ្ជាក់​ ពី​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ “​មេ​បក្ស​ខ្លះ​អួត​ថា​ប្រជា​ធិ​ប​តេ​យ្យ​ អនុប្រធាន​ហ្នឹង​ដូច​ដាក់​កន្ដ្រក​ស្ពាយ​តាមទេ​​ គេ​អត់ឱ្យ​និយាយ​អី​ទេ​។ ដោយសារ​គេ​អត់​នៅទេ​ទើប​គេ​ឱ្យ​និយាយ​យូរៗ​ម្ដង​ និយាយ​ទៅ​ខុស​ទៀត​ និយាយភ្លាវទៀត​ ដូច្នេះ​គេ​អត់​ដែល​ឱ្យ​ចេញ​មុខ​ផង​ហ្នឹង​ គេ​ដាក់​កន្ដ្រក​តាម​ហ្នឹង​ ជា​អនុ​ប្រ​ធាន​ទីងមោង​ហ្នឹង​ ដូច្នេះ​មក​ធ្វើ​ឯង​អួត​ខ្លាំង​អី​ អនុប្រធាន​ទីងមោង​ពេល​គេ​នៅ​គេ​មិន​ឱ្យ​ចេញ​ធ្វើ​អី​ផង​ហ្នឹង​”​ ។​

          ដោយសារ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ មិន​ព្រម​សារភាព​ បែរជា​ជេរ​ប្រមាថ​គង់​ គាំ​ ថា​ជា​អ្នក​ខ្ចី​ដង្ហើម​គេ​ដក​ និង​ជា​មនុស្ស​ល្ងង់ខ្លៅ​ មនុស្ស​ទីង​ មោង​ គង់​ គាំ​ បាន​ប្រាប់​ទៅ​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​ គណបក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ថា​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​អា​ យ៉ង​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ដោយ​ផ្អែក​តាម​ សម្ដី​ដើម​ទាំងស្រុង​ក្នុង​កិច្ច​សន្ទនា​តាម​ទូរស័ព្ទ​រវាង​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ នឹង​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ។​

​សូម​ស្ដាប់​សម្ដី​បញ្ជាក់​របស់​ គង់​ គាំ ៖​“​កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ គេ​លែង​ជឿ​ហើយ​ ពីព្រោះ​ នៅ​ក្នុង​អា​ស្អី​ អាថ​​កំបាំង​សម្ងាត់​អីហ្នឹង​ នៅ​មួយ​វគ្គ​ទៀត​ សម្ដេច​តេ​ជោ​ថា​ ខា​យូរៗ​ ខា​ឯង​ដាក់​ខ្ញុំ​មួយ​ក្ឌាំង​ទៅ​ ខ្ញុំ​ដាក់​ខា​ឯង​ ម៉ា​ក្ឌាំង​ទៅ​ ដើម្បី​ឱ្យ​គេ​ជឿ​ថា​ ខា​ឯង​និង​ ខ្ញុំ​ឈ្លោះ​គ្នា​ មិនមែន​គ្នា​ឯង​ទេ​ តែ​ការ​ពិត​គ្នា​ឯង​សោះ​ ដូច្នេះ​គាត់​ដាក់​អា​ខ្សែ​អាត់​នោះ​ម៉ា​ក្ឌាំង​ទៅ​ដើម្បី​ជួយ​លាង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ថា​មើល​យើង​ឈ្លោះ​គ្នា​មែន​ហ្នឹង​  មាន​ត្រូវ​គ្នា​ឯណា​”​ ។​

 ដូច្នេះ​ការ​លាក់​ លៀម​របស់​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ មិន​ចង់ឱ្យ​អ្នក​គាំ​ ទ្រ​ដឹង​ពី​ទំនាក់ទំនង​ស៊ីជម្រៅ​ជាមួយ​សម្ដេច​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ពិសេស​ខ្លាច​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ យក​ធ្វើ​ ជា​គោលដៅ​នៃ​ការ​វាយប្រហារ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ រឹតតែ​បង្កើន​កំហឹង​លើ​បក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ទ្វេ​ដង​ថែម​ទៀត​ ។​ 

          កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ពី​អ​សមត្ថ​ភាព​ក្នុង​ការ​ដឹកនាំ​បក្ស​របស់​លោក​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ និង​ប្រវត្ដិ​នៃ​ការ​ចាញ់ឆ្នោត​របស់​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ យ៉ាង​ដូច្នេះថា ៖ “​ងាក​ទៅ​គណបក្ស​ហ៊្វុន​​ស៊ិ​ន​ប៉ិច​រាជា​និយម​ អា​លំ​អា​លាយ​ខ្ទេច​ ឥឡូវ​ងាក​មក​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ដូច​ឯកឧត្ដម​ ម៉ៅ​ មុនី​វណ្ណ​ថា​ អត់​មាន​អ្នក​ចូល​ មាន​តែ​អ្នក​ចេញ។​​ អ្នក​ដែល​នៅ​ពី​ឆ្ងាយ​ មើល​ពី​ឆ្ងាយ​​ ឃើញ​ថា​ល្អ​ ស្រឡាញ់​ណាស់​ ស្រាប់តែ​ទៅ​ដល់​ជិត​ ធំគ្មឹះៗ ថយ​ចេញ​វិញ​ ចេះ​តែ​ថយ​បន្ដបន្ទាប់​ទៅ​ គេ​មិន​ចង់​នៅ​ក្រោម​ដំបូល​របស់​បុគ្គល​ម្នាក់ ​ពីរ​នាក់​នោះ​ទេ​ ។​ គេ​ត្រូវ​នៅ​ក្រោម​ ដំបូល​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​ គេ​អ្នកមាន​ឧត្ដម​គតិ​ជាតិ​ គេ​មិន​ទៅ​​បម្រើ​បុគ្គល​ បម្រើ​គ្រួសារ​នោះ​ទេ​ គេ​អួត​ថា​មាន​តែ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ទេ​ ជាជើង​ឯក​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​នៅ​កម្ពុជា​ ជើង​ឯកអី គេ​ទាត់​ខ្ទាត​​អស់​​ហើយ​​ហ្នឹង​​ ឯក​តែ​ម្នាក់​ឯង​ទៅ​”​ ។​ 

          ការ​ប្រទូស្ដ​រ៉ា​យ​គ្នា​រវាង​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ នឹង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​រុញច្រាន​មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ ទាំង​២​ឱ្យ​ធ្លាក់​ពី​គន្លង​ប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ​ និង​បាត់បង់​ទាំងស្រុង​នូវ​តម្លៃ​ជា​អ្នក​នយោបាយ។​​ នេះ​ហើយ​ជាដើម​ហេតុ​នាំ​ឱ្យ​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ទាំង​២​ ដក​ការ​ទុក​ចិត្ដ​ពី​មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​មក​គាំទ្រ​គណបក្ស​ប្រជាជន​កម្ពុជា​ ។​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ដែល​គេ​ ដឹង​គ្រប់​គ្នា​ថា​ ជា​មេ​បក្ស​តូចតាច​ហាក់​ ចង់​ប្រាប់​មក​សម្ដេច​តេ​ជោ​ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ថា​បើ​ដឹង​ចំណុចខ្សោយ​ខ្ញុំ​​ហើយ​ ម្ដេច​មិន​ជួយ​ លាក់​ផង​ ចាំបាច់​បញ្ចេញ​ឯកសារសន្ទនា​នេះ​ធ្វើ​អ្វី?​
          បើ​យោង​តាម​ប្រសាសន៍​របស់​សម្ដេច​តេ​ ជោ​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ប្រមុខ​គណបក្ស​ប្រជា​ជន​កម្ពុជា​ ការ​បែកធ្លាយ​រឿង​ឯកសារ​សន្ទនា​នេះ​ មាន​ដើមហេតុ​យ៉ាង​ដូច្នេះ​ “​ប្រហែលជា​អ្នក​ដែល​បញ្ចេញ​ឯកសារ​ ព្រោះ​ឯកសារ​វា​នៅ​ក្នុង​សំណុំ​ឯកសារ​។​ ឯកសារ​គេ​យក​ទៅ​រក្សា​ទុក​នៅ​មួយ​កន្លែង​ ប៉ុន្ដែ​ប្រហែលជា​បងប្អូន​គេ​បញ្ចេញ​ទៅ​ ដោយសារ​តែ​គេ​ខឹង​ឯកឧត្ដម​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ហ្នឹង​ តែងតែ​បដិសេធ​ថា​ គ្មាន​ទំនាក់​ ទំនង​អ្វី​ទេ​ គាត់​តែងតែ​ស្បថស្បែ​ជាមួយ​ ខាង​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ នោះ។​​ ដល់​អញ្ចឹង​បងប្អូន​ប្រហែល​​ជា​ធុញទ្រាន់​ពេកក៏​​រុញ​អា​ឯកសារ​ហ្នឹង​ចេញ​ទៅ​ អាហ្នឹង​រឿង​វា​អញ្ចឹង​​ទៅ​ ។​ ប៉ុន្ដែ​ទោះជា​យ៉ាងណា​ក៏​ដោយ​ នៅ​ក្នុង​ហ្នឹង​ ខ្ញុំ​បាន​ណែនាំ​ថា​ ខា​អើយ​ ខ្ញុំ​ហៅ​ថា​ខា​អញ្ចឹង​​ ​សួរ​តាំងពី​កូន​ប៉ុន្មាន​អី​ប៉ុន្មាន​។​ ហើយ​គេ​ចរារណ៍​​អាហ្នឹង​លឿន​ណាស់​ ហើយ​អ្នក​ចរារណ៍​​លឿន​ជាងគេ​ គឺ​ខាង​គណបក្ស​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ចរាចរណ៍​​អា​ឯកសារ​ហ្នឹង​ ព្រោះ​គណបក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ សង្ស័យ​យូរហើយ​”​ ។​ 

          សេចក្ដី​បំភ្លឺ​របស់​សម្ដេច​តេ​ជោ​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ ប្រមុខ​គណបក្ស​ប្រជាជន​កម្ពុជា​ ជុំវិញ​សំណុំរឿង​ឯកសារ​សន្ទនា​តាម​ទូរស័ព្ទ​ត្រូវ​បាន​គណបក្ស ​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ចាត់​ ទុក​ថា​ ជា​ភស្ដុ​តាង​ដ៏​មាន​តម្លៃ​បំផុត​  សម្រាប់​បញ្ជាក់​ទៅ​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ និង​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​បក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ថា​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ជា​មនុស្ស​របស់​សម្ដេច​ហ៊ុន​ សែន​។​  ក្នុង​ហេតុការណ៍​នេះ​ គង់​ គាំ​ បាន​បញ្ជាក់​ យ៉ាង​ឡា​រិ​ក​ប្រាប់​ទៅ​អ្នកគាំទ្រ​គណបក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ឱ្យ​ចាំ​ទុក​ថា​ បើ​ចូល​ជាមួយ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ចូល​ជាមួយ​សម្ដេច​ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ តែ​ម្ដង​ទៅ​ ។​ 

          នេះ​បើ​តាម​ការ​ផ្ដាំ​របស់​ គង់​ គាំ​ “​មក​ដល់​ ធ្លាយ​ឯកសារ​អាទិ៍កំបាំងអី​ម្ង៉ៃ​ណោះ​ទៀត​ ហ្នឹង​ កាន់តែ​ធ្វើ​ឱ្យ​ខ្ញុំ​យល់​ថា​ បើ​ចូល​ជា​ មួយ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ចូល​ជាមួយ​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ តែ​ម្ដង​ហើយ​នេះ​”​ ។​ 

          ចំណែក​លោក​ ថា​ច់​ សេដ្ឋា​ មន្ត្រី​គណបក្ស​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ដែល​ស្អប់ខ្ពើម​ចរិត​ គ្មាន​អៀនខ្មាស​របស់​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​សម្ដែង​នូវ​ក្ដី​អស់សង្ឃឹម​ចំពោះ​អ​នា​គតនៃ​​ជីវិត​នយោបាយរបស់​គណបក្ស​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ដែល​ចេះ​តែ​រួម​តូច​ពី​មួយ​ថ្ងៃ​ទៅ​មួយ​ខែ​ ពី​មួយ​ខែ​ទៅ​មួយ​ឆ្នាំ​ បាន​ថ្លែង​ថា“​ចង់បាន​ រួបរួម​គ្នា​ ប៉ុន្ដែ​ទន្ទឹម​នឹង​ចង់បាន​តែងតែ​រិះគន់​ វាយប្រហារ​​គ្នាឯង​​ សូម​ឱ្យ​លោក​ទាំង​អស់​គ្នា​ពិចារណា​ទាំងអស់​គ្នា​មើល៍​។​ យើង​ដឹង​ហើយ​ កាលណា​វ៉ៃ​គ្នា​វា​ចំណេញ​អ្នក​ណា? វា​មិន​​ចំណេញ​គណបក្សកាន់អំណាច​ អញ្ចឹង​​ កាលណា​យើង​វ៉ៃ​គ្នា​យើង​ខ្លាំង​កាលណា​ អាហ្នឹង​ គឺ​គេ​សប្បាយចិត្ដ​កាល​ហ្នឹង​ ហើយ​មិនមែន​គណបក្ស​របស់​គាត់​ផ្ទាល់​ខ្លួន​ហ្នឹង​ចំណេញ​ទេ​ ។​ ទោះបី​គាត់​ឡើង​៥​ កៅអី​ក៏ដោយ​ ក៏​​មិន​ឈ្នះ​។​ ឯ​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ចុះ​១០​កៅអី​ ក៏​នៅតែ​​មិន​ឈ្នះ​ អាហ្នឹង​នៅ​តែ​ចំណេញ​គណ​បក្ស​ប្រជាជន​ដដែលទេ​​ សូម​ឱ្យ​លោក​ទាំង​អស់​គិតពិចារណា​ មិនមែន​យើង​គ្រាន់​តែ​ថា​ចង់​ រួបរួម​​ ប៉ុន្ដែ​លក្ខខណ្ឌ​យើង​រាប់​មិន​អស់​ គណបក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ មាន​ក្រុមប្រឹក្សា​ទាំង​អស់ហើយ​ធ្វើ​អី​មិនកើត​ បាន​តែ​និយាយ​ ហើយ​មិន​ព្រម​ធ្វើ​ សុទ្ធតែ​គណបក្ស​បុគ្គលអី ​ ខ្ញុំ​បានឮ​ ហើយ​ខ្ញុំ​មិន​និយាយទេ​​ ​តែ​សុំ​ឱ្យ​ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋ​គិត​ថា​ រាល់​ការ​លើក​ឡើង​ រាល់​ការ​វាយប្រហារ​ទាំងអស់​ តើ​បាន​ចំណេញ​ ទៅ​លើ​អ្នក​ណា​?​ គិតតែ​ប៉ុណ្ណឹង​បាន​ហើយ​ ហើយ​បើ​ចំណេញ​ឱ្យ​អ្នក​ណា​ តើ​អ្នក​នយោបាយ​ទាំងអស់នោះ​​​បម្រើ​ឱ្យ​នយោបាយ​​គណបក្ស​ណា?​​ ថា​ខ្លួនឯង​គ្រាន់បើ​ទៀត​ ថា​ខ្លួនឯង​​អ្នក​សេ​ហ្នា​ជាតិ​ទៀត​ តាម​ពិត​បំបែក​កម្លាំង​គ្នា​សោះ​ហ្នឹង​”​ ។​ 

          សម្ដី​ ថា​ច់​ សេដ្ឋា​ ដែល​ខំ​ពន្យល់​ ទៅ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ឱ្យ​ឈប់​ ហែកហួរ​បក្ស​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ មិន​អាច​ពន្លត់​ភ្លើងកំហឹង​ដែល​ ឆេះ​រោលរាល​ពេញ​ទ្រូង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​ ឡើយ​ ។​ ផ្ទុយ​ទៅ​វិញ​ ការ​ឆ្លើយ​តប​របស់​ ថា​ច់​ សេដ្ឋា​ ប្រៀប​បាន​នឹង​យក​សាំង​ទៅ​ ជះ​លើ​ភ្លើង​ឱ្យ​កាន់​​តែ​ឆាបឆេះ​ទ្វេ​ដង​ថែម​ទៀត​ ។​ អញ្ចឹង​​ហើយ ​ទើប​បុរាណ​ផ្ដាំ​ទុក​ថា​ “​កុំ​ពត់​ ស្រឡៅ​ កុំ​ប្រដៅ​ជនពាល​”​ ។​ សូម​ស្ដាប់​ ការ​ឆ្លើយ​តប​របស់​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ដែល​ឋិត​ក្នុង​ភាព​កំរោលចូល​ប្រៀប​បាន​នឹង​សម្ដី​ជនពាល​ ជ្រក​ក្រោម​ស្លាក​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ បាន​ដោះសារ​​ ដូច​តទៅ​នេះ“​ឥឡូវ​នរណា​ ថា​គណបក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​អា​យ៉ង​បបួល​ទៅ​ ស្បថៗ​មើល៍​ បើ​ថា​បក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ អា​យ៉ង​ សូម​ឱ្យ​បក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​រលាយ​  សូម​ឱ្យ​មេដឹកនាំ​​បក្ស​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​វិនាស​​ ​តែបើសិនណា​ អ្នក​​ហ្នឹង​​បង្ខូចខ្ញុំ​​ទេ​ សូម​ឱ្យ​បក្ស​អ្នកឯង​រលាយ​ ឱ្យ​មេ​ដឹកនាំ​បក្ស​ហ្នឹង​ខ្ចាត់ព្រាត់​ តើ​មែនទេ​បង​ប្អូន?​​ កុំឱ្យ​ ហួសហេតុ​ពេក​  ។​ បើ​មិន​បាន​ជួយ​ចូក​ ជួយ​ចែវ​ទេ​ មក​យក​ជើង​រា​ អាឯង​​គេ​វ៉ៃ​ធ្លាក់​​ពី​លើ​រេញ​អស់ហើយ​ ដល់​វេន​​គ្នា​ឡើង​វ៉ៃ​ ម្ដង​ហើយ​ ដល់វេន​​សិទ្ធិ​មនុស្ស​ឡើង​វ៉ៃ​ មិន​បាន​ជួយ​ទះដៃ​ទេ​ មក​ចាប់ជើង​ តិច​លោ​តែ​​ គ្រវាស​ម៉ា​ជើង​ទៅ​ត្រូវ​បាក់​ធ្មេញ​ថែម​ទៀត។​​ នៅ​ឱ្យ​ស្ងៀម​ ទៅ​ប៉ង់​សឺ​ម៉​ង់​ទៅ​ រៀប​ខ្លួនឯង​ឱ្យ​ស្អា​តទៅ​ បើ​ចង់​ឡើង​វ៉ៃ​ ចាំ​ រៀបខ្លួនឲ្យ​ស្រួល​​ឡើងវៃ​​វិញ​មក​ បើ​គេ​ធាក់​ធ្លាក់​រេញ​ ហើយ​ហ្នឹង​។ យើង​​ខ្ញុំ​វ៉ៃ​តែ​២​ទឹក​ទេ​ បើ​ចាញ់​  សុខចិត្ដ​ចុះ​ មិន​ដូច​អស់លោក​ទេ វ៉ៃ​ម៉ា​អា​យ៉ូ​ស​ហើយ​ ចាញ់ហើយ​ មិន​ព្រម​ចុះ​ទៀត​”​ ។​

ឆ្លង​តាម​សម្រែកស្បត់ស្បែរ ​និង​បណ្ដា​សារ​ដែល​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ បាន​ស្រែក​ក្ដែ​ងៗ​ អម្បាញ់មិញ​ អ្នកគាំទ្រ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ និង​អ្នក​គាំទ្រ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ កំពុង​សំឡឹង​មើល​ថា​ តើ​រវាង​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ និ​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ មួយ​ណា​ ជា​អ្នក​ចាញ់​សម្បថ?​​ និង​មួយ​ណា​ជា​អ្នក​ ត្រូវ​បណ្ដាសា​រ​?​ ប៉ុន្ដែ​បុរាណ​បាន​ពោល​ថា​ “​ទឹក​ហូរ​មិន​ដែល​ហត់​ មនុស្ស​ទ័លច្រក​ស្បថ​កុំឱ្យ​ជឿ​”​ ។​ 

          ចំណែក​សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ដែល​យើង​មើល​ឃើញ​ថា​ បាន​ជាន់ក​ដកស្លាប​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ នោះ​ ក៏​ត្រូវ​បាន​សម្ដេច​តេ​ជោ​ ហ៊ុន​ សែន​ បង្ហើប​ឱ្យ​ដឹង​ថា​ ធ្លាប់​ជួប​សន្ទនា​រយៈ​ ពេល​បី​ម៉ោង​ជាមួយ​សម្ដេច​ដែរ​ ។​
សម្ដេច​ លើក​ឡើង​ថា​ “ ​ប៉ុន្ដែ​ឯកឧត្ដម​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ វិញ​ក៏​កុំ​ភ្លេច​ថា​ ខ្លួន​បាន​និយាយ​អី​ខ្លះ​ជា​មួយ​ខ្ញុំ​នោះ​ ប្រយ័ត្ន​ក្រែងលោ​វា​ឡង​ទៅ​ ឡង​មក​អ្នក​កាន់​ឯកសារ​ឥឡូវ​ខ្ញុំ​ឱ្យ​ឃ្លុំ​ បេ​ទុក​។​ ព្រោះ​ជួប​គ្នា​៣​​ម៉ោង​ ហើយ​ក្នុង​បន្ទប់​ ធម្មតា​ទេ​អាហ្នឹង​នោះ​ ទៅ​ស្រុក​ណា​ក៏​គេ​ធ្វើ​អញ្ចឹង​​ដែរ​ ទៅកន្លែងណា​ក៏គេធ្វើអញ្ចឹងដែរ​។​ ថ្ងៃ​ហ្នឹង​គេក៏​​ថត​ សំឡេង​ខ្ញុំ​ទាំងអស់ដែរ​។​​ និយាយ​ចង់​ខ្សឹប​យ៉ាង​ម៉េច​ក៏​គេ​នៅ​តែ​ថត​ដែរ​”​ ។​ 

ការ​បង្ហើប​ យ៉ាង​ដូច្នេះ​របស់​សម្ដេច​បាន​ធ្វើ​ឱ្យ​ កឹ​ម​ សុខា​ ស្រ​វេ​ស្រវា​ក្រោក​ទាំង​ត្រដាបត្រដួស​ បន្ទាប់​ពី​ដួល​សន្លប់​ដោយ​កណ្ដាប់ដៃ​ សម​ រ​ង្ស៊ី​ ។ តើ​មេ​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ទាំង​២​មាន​ ល្បិច​អ្វី​បោក​សកម្មជន​ខ្លួន​ទៀត?​ ៕​

Address and Selected Impromptu Comments by Samdech Techo Hun Sen at the Closing of the Annual Conference of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2012-2013 and Direction Setting 2013-2014

By CNV Team

Today, I am very pleased to participate in the Closing of the Annual Conference of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2012-2013, and Direction Setting 2013-2014, and inaugurate an academic building located in the campus of the Royal University of Agriculture.  At the outset, I would like to express my warm welcome to Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, distinguished national and international guests, lecturers and all students who have attended this meaningful closing conference.  This conference is truely providing additional meaning to our society because this event has provided an opportunity for a gathering, exchange of ideas, and review of various achievements we have accomplished in agriculture sector by verifying with the indicators that we have raised in the past years.  With this regard, we have generally received an appropriate opportunity to collect all experiences and new measures to continue preparing strategic plan with consistency and clear-cut goal for agriculture development and promote further active participation from all ministries-institutions, development partners, private sector and communities in order to ensure working efficiency, competitiveness and the establishment of new creation, which is the foundation to sustain the economic growth now and in the future in our society.

Taking this opportunity, I would like to highly evaluate the management and officials in all levels of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries who have worked hard with responsibility to achieve numerous achievements in 2012, in which there is another new academic building to be officially inaugurated now.  Those efforts moderately response to the agriculture and human resources development.  For now, I would like to also support the establishment of the faculty of rubber science in order to respond to the fast growing of the rubber sector in Cambodia today.  In this spirit, I firmly believe that we all will physically and mentally try our utmost effort to continue the cooperation in implementing its role to achieve new targets for the interest of our socio-economic development in the coming years.

The agriculture sector today is still playing significant role in promoting local production growth, job creation, and contributing to the poverty reduction of the people.  Besides, the agriculture sector will continue the basic role for economic growth and socio-economic development in Cambodia in the coming decades although Cambodia has diversified her economy, including industrialization.  Practically, the agricultural sector is not only to ensure food security, but also contribute to the socio-economic development of the nation.  In this sense, if we look at the outcome of the Cambodia economic performance in 2012 we have seen that Cambodia achieved the growth of 7.3%, the Gross Domestic Product per Capita increased from USD760 in 2008 to approximately USD 1000 in 2012, and we expect that in the year 2013 it will reach more than USD1000.  This outcome is basically resulted from the annual growth of agriculture, industry and services.  It is noted that the export of agricultural products, especially the export of rice and other important products have also been on the rise.  Practically, if we take note of the quantity of rice export in the first three months of this year, it increased to 95.228 tons, while the first three months in 2012 was only 36.430 tons, which means that it increased by 161.4%. Therefore, the growth in agricultural sector is not only improving our economy but also transforming the red dry land to become the green area in all seasons, as well as allowing our youths in rural area to be employed, reducing migration, and improving their livelihood.

Based on the report made by H.E Chan Sarun, Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the agriculture sector has grown in average about 4.3% in 2012, in which the rice production was about 3 million hectars, and the land of 2.98 million hectars could be cultivated, and the average yield per year in both dry and rainy seasons is 3.117 tons per hectar, totally we have received the unmilled rice of 9.29 million tons or approximately 4.73 million tons, which is another success for Cambodia.  In general, we can evaluate that the rice yield from year to year has been on the rise with pride, especially during the last 2 decades, and the rice production is still a primary production to sustain the living standard of the people in the rural area and export for economic growth.

At the same time, we have further promoted the agriculture production in all directions, especially the strategic cultivation such as rubber that is more impressively moving and other industrial crops as well as the animal rearing and aquaculture that is not only responding to the need of domestic food security but also support economic growth.  However, we must increase attention to ensure that our agriculture sector is still strong and we are able to sustain with the external crisis such as food price crisis, natural disasters, flood and climate change.  Moreover, we have also to pay attention to the building of supporting infrastructure, including irrigation network and rural infrastructure, land ownership allocation, increased access to new technology, and agriculture intensification service, and market information.

In this sense, Cambodia will put more efforts in developing physical infrastructures and continue to restore the supporting foundation to expand agriculture potential in order to contribute to accelerate and enlarge the national economic size.  This is a firm willingness of the Royal Government who have always abided by and implemented over the period of 30 years. This commitment has made the poverty rate decline continually since the bare hand in 1979 to 22.9% in 2009 and to about 20% in 2012.  We have also expected that this poverty rate will further decline to under 19% in 2013.  In the future, we will try our best to drag down the poverty rate until the elimination of the poverty through the continued development of agriculture and economic diversification.

At this point, I would like to re-emphasize that although the agriculture sector in Cambodia has been in much progress, the Royal Government with me as a Prime Minister, will not implement the taxation on agricultural land.

No Tax on Household Agricultural Land – CPP Policy
I think we need to make this point clear. Charging tax on household agricultural land is not and will not be the policy pursued by the Cambodian People’s Party, whether there will be increasing number of farmers. I would reassure that whether there will or will not be my presence, I am urging the leaders of the Cambodian People’s Party, whoever will continue the Party’s policy, not to impose tax household agricultural land. We need to do everything we can so that our people will benefit. With their benefits, people will spend and we will charge them the value added tax for whatever they will buy.

To impose no land tax is like helping them right in the field. For example, they need to spend one or two hundred thousand Riel per hectare as tax. When we do not charge tax from them, they could use the money for something else, like purchasing a bicycle for their kids or other agricultural utensils. This is my will and I make it clear now that we will never impose tax on household agricultural land. However, this is the policy set out and supported by the Cambodian People’s Party only. I do not know what other Parties would do on this matter. They are talking about increasing salary, I doubt if they could do it without increasing taxation.

Well, that is their problem. As for the time that the Cambodian People’s Party rules, whether there will be or will not be me, I wish to make this will clear to all that no such tax will be imposed.

In this context, I am still optimistic that the promotion of agricultural productivity and diversification is still the major priority of Cambodia either in the current economic situation or in the future as mentioned that “Cambodia is an Agricultural Country”.  In this spirit, and in an aim to contribute to what we have been implementing so far and in order to further promote the development of this sector to support the Cambodian economy, I would like to take this opportunity to provide a number of additional recommendations to be used as foundation for implementation and information sharing.  These include:

First: Must continue promoting the progress in agricultural sector in an average of 3%-4% per year by having to diversifying both productivity and diversification, and export.  In this connection, it is necessary for us to strengthen and expand supporting physical infrastructure, applied experimentation, and modern technological transfer, appropriate knowledge in all subjects related to the improvement of production in all kinds of crops, especially rice in order to change the perception of the farmers from self-sufficient farming to agri-business farming responding to the opportunity of growth of world food security, which is regarded as “golden opportunity” for Cambodia.  At the same time, we have to implement actively on the Agriculture Census through the Kingdom of Cambodia that was just started at the beginning of this year to be more successful because of the fact that the creation of agriculture statistic system is a necessary foundation to prepare comprehensive strategic policy for agricultural development.  For now the task that needs to be promoted is the observation, assessment, and doing inventory on the use of agricultural land all over the country, aiming to get the clear data to be used as inputs to serve the preparation of agricultural development and defining a number of cultivation areas to orient the agriculture intensification and diversification with high economic efficiency sustainability of the use of agricultural land.

Second: Must encourage the compilation and capacity building of agricultural community all over the country that is the foundation for agriculture development by means of consolidation in partnership with the private sector in the framework of contract farming and best practice in agriculture, that will assist the farmers throughout the country to receive new technologies, sufficient credit, and ensure stability of product supply to the market either quantity or quality.

Third: The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy, the Ministry of Planning, Supreme National Economic Council must jointly study the issue in order to solve the issue of agro-industry, meaning that promoting the farming product based industry in order to be processed as final products for local consumption and export to speed up this sector to add more value to the farming products and increase income for our farmers.

Fourth: I would like to highly appreciate the efforts and initiatives made in boosting the mechanization of agriculture in the process of production and processing instead of using the labor forces at the rural areas that was absorbed by the sectors of industry, services, and employment market abroad.  In this particular case, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries must review and encourage the establishment of craft or factories of partially or whole installing the agriculture machineries in order to avoid the total import from the foreign countries to some extent.

Fifth: Must encourage and enhance the animal rearing in all forms according to a clear agricultural standard in both animal and animal feeds among farmers, medium and mega farmlands.  At the same time, we must encourage investment on the establishment of factories for animal feeds, production of animal food medicines, the creation of animal slaughterhouse with high standard in order to ensure the supply of animal meat and animal products with hygiene, quality, and safety for domestic market and export and increase income to the animal feeders and national economy.  We must also prepare a comprehensive strategic plan for the development of animal production based on the progress of globalization.

On Issue of Pig Imported from Abroad
While talking about this issue, I have seen on TV about the proposal made by HE Mong Rithy, Head of the Private Sector’s agricultural working group in relation to import of pig from abroad. I would suggest two ideas for him so that he could think about it and bring it out for more discussion with our people and for taking further measures. I would urge on this matter that we have to look at the whole forest and not any single tree. Take for example if there is increasingly high demand, no matter how many you have in your stock – in pork or beef, you may have problem ensuring the supply. If in that case we prohibit import of meat, we would firstly be against the rules set out by the World Trade Organization but secondly would also cause reciprocal inflation that is going to be destructive to the economy.

We should be careful with this view. As we all can see now, we have a balance between demand and supply for the fact that there is contribution from local animal husbandry and from import from abroad. We had better think harder about what would be the consequences if we were to prohibit import from foreign countries. A fundamental reform in fisheries did bring the price of fish down, but we should bear in mind that fish is not the only source of protein that our people need. We should therefore think harder about its repercussion effect. I am therefore urging you to figure out the growing demand and ability to respond from own husbandry.

Secondly, in 2015, if I should remind you, only two years more, we will have this ASEAN Community thing. We should try to find a better way to produce low-cost animal feeding, as I recommended just now, or we will not be able to give answer to the question. I think this is the answer and I would urge no administrative measures. We should figure out economic measures in place of administrative ones. When the ASEAN Community is here for real, there will be no barriers as all doors will be open. We will have certain goods that we can push in to regional markets but we also have to allow goods from other countries to compete in our market too.

It is a reciprocal approach. We will engage in the game and compete. If we were to place trade barrier from now, it will be destructive when the time comes because a sudden shutting down of pig/pork import would indeed create demand for beef, chicken and/or fish. On that instant, they would ask for a higher price. The question here is why our neighboring countries are raising animal at a cheaper cost than we would, and they can sell them to us. I am sure animal feeding cost should be one of them. How to produce los-cost animal feeding would be a question here. I wish to add further that administrative measure is not going to bring about real economic growth. One would apply it only when it is necessary.

As we are also a member of the World Trade Organization, we should try to familiarize ourselves with the trend, as there are two more years only to get to ASEAN Economic Community. We should not think of opening the country when the time comes. Closing our country would also lead to others to do in reciprocation. When all will do that, it is a disaster. Recently, Minister of Trade, HE Cham Prasidh and his Thai counterpart have worked out to resolve the problem concerning agricultural products in the western part of the country. Prime Minister Yingluck also talked to me lately that the trade issue between the two countries has improved now.

Thais will buy our agricultural products in Banteay Meanjei, Uddar Meanjei, Battambang, Pailin, etc. What will happen if we stop their pig from coming in? Based on that report I noted on TV, I suggest that the head of the agricultural working group reconsider this matter. We cannot afford to think only about pork without considering its repercussion on beef, chicken and fish. I would seek our people’s understanding on this matter because we cannot afford to neglect the need of our people in the whole country for local families who raise pig. I respect the right for private sector to share their opinion with the Royal Government but there has to be point that the Royal Government could and could not accept.
We should think about diversifying animal husbandry to make it cheaper in Cambodia. We may allow certain protection so that our people can produce animal feeding at a lower cost. In fact, the cost of producing animal feeding in Thailand and Vietnam should be higher than in Cambodia. Why could they do it cheaper than us? They sell it to us. In trade, there is a reciprocal relation. If we refuse their product, they would do the same to ours.
As for restriction on pig with disease, yes it is important for us to observe strictly. I would ask for joint efforts of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and the Ministry of Health. As far as restriction concerning disease, we have been strict on their goods and they are to our goods too. There are two different issues here (1) the restriction of movement of animal for diseases and (2) import pig jeopardizes local animal husbandry industry. I would urge a thorough clarification and explanation on this issue to our people.

Sixth: All levels of sub-national authorities, police, military police, armed forces, and related institutions must close cooperate with the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries to prevent the spread of Bird Flue (H5N1) that is still threatening Cambodia and other countries in the region and we should not overlook the outbreak of the new Bird Flue (H7N9) that has not happened in Cambodia yet.  The sub-national authorities and related institutions must continue participating to prevent the illegal movement of animals along the border provinces.

Preventing Import of Disqualified Food Products
We have taken measures already and the implementation already commenced. We still have some loopholes. More efforts need to address this shortcoming. Flow of imported animal without management and inspection has reduced but more also need to be carried out. As we have all learned that recently we caught disqualified chicken legs imported from other country. However, we seem to have seen less of those chicken legs these days. Still we are seeing chicken legs on sale. We need to strengthen prevention of imported and disqualified food products.

Seventh: Must pay attention to cluster family rubber community by increasing support in technicality, especially the selection of seeds, maintenance, treatment, harvest, and processing, and we must encourage the development of agro-industry rubber in the economic land concession allocated by the Royal Government to the local and foreign investors for large scale development, and on the hand it will be used as a core of family rubber development in the region to increase the value chain to be more economically efficient including the improvement of quality, processing, packaging, and the commercialization of rubber products according to international standard.  At this point, the Cambodian Institute for Rubber Research must cooperate with the companies that have received the economic land concession in order to encourage the import of highly yielded rubber seed and eliminate the low productivity rubber seed.  We must also expand the experiment location and strengthen technical aspects related to rubber and capacity building on the management of seed, selection of seed, breeding and dissemination in both quantity and quality.

I would like to mention a bit on the results we have achieved and what we will achieve in the future on the development of rubber crop.  Until 2012, the Royal Government has provided economic land concession of 1.5 million hectares, in which the rubber sector covers 80% or 1.2 million hectares.  At the present, the cultivated land is 300,000 hectares using the workers of 100,000 people.  During the next 5 years, 70% of rubber plantation will be cultivated and harvested on the land of 840,000 hectares using workers of 1.3 million.  In total, the rubber crop will create jobs for 1.3 million people, which is contribution to improve the living standard of the people and increase Cambodia economic potential.  Thus, rubber development is our necessary and urgent task.  At this point, I would like to illustrate that Cambodia has used the forest cover of 1.5 million hectares for economic land concession, and Cambodia still has the forest cover of 9.2 million hectares.

This is the reflection of striking the balance between the necessity in creating jobs for the people to reduce poverty and migration and the necessity to protect the environment and management of natural resources.  Besides, the Royal Government realizes that rubber is also forest, thus, the rubber of 1.2 million hectars will create jobs for 1.3 million people is the contribution to maintain the forest cover as well as improving the living standard of our people.

Rubber – Land Coverage and Profit Making
On this point, we need to look ahead to the future like 2030 when Cambodia, according to its goal, would be going from lower-middle income country, after passing the state of low-income country this year, to higher-middle income country. We would try the best to push Cambodia out of lower-middle income trap and our goal has been set so by 2030. Looking onward, when we complete our plan for irrigation system, we will be able to increase our production from the current state that we could export up to three million tons of rice while only a certain area of our rice field cultivates twice a year. With irrigation system in place, we will be able to strengthen intensive farming system.

As far as rubber is concerned, its competitive state and demand for rubber is not wining down. Rubber and rice bear the same state of competition and demand. Rubber, once bigger, is considered as forest coverage too. Promoting rubber plantation on economic land concession and/or land measured and issued title for the people in the framework of existing policy on land issue, would increase land under rubber. We will then have more land under forest coverage and people will generate economic benefit from their rubber too. According to Mak Kimhong, the price for rubber today has stayed at 2450 USD per ton.

In Malaysia, their forest coverage is palm oil tree and rubber too. They make their country green. They are replacing former natural forest. They cleared them and grew in their place trees with more economic values. I think we will need to encourage more cultivation of rubber. There are more and more people like to grow rubber between one to five and ten hectares on their land. Some of you who have studied and wished to establish Institute of Agriculture could do a great deal to help them. They definitely need your expertise. Also a possibility, they send their family members to learn the skill and techniques in growing, managing and taking care of rubber because they need someone to look after their rubber.

Eighth: The comprehensive reform in the fisheries sector, that I have led nationwide, has been contributing significantly to reducing the inflation in Cambodia since 2011.  In this regard, I would like to recommend the Fisheries Administration to continue implementing the 7 recommendations set out by the Royal Government in increasing the activities to crack down fishing crimes, protect the fisheries reservation, increase cooperation with the provincial, municipal, district authorities, armed forces in all levels, implement practical action in strengthening the implementation of fisheries law in order to prevent fisheries crime and maintain fisheries resources.  Moreover, we must improve the capacity of fishing community that has been set up already to become a fishing community with no fisheries crime as well as promoting the feeding of fish in the pond, fishing BE and farm, and try to set up community fishing pond in every commune all over the country.  At the same time, we must further carry out the research on the natural stock in both freshwater and salt water and prepare strategy for adaptation to the climate change on fisheries in order to be prepared in reducing the incidental impacts with the objective to promote the productivity of fisheries to serve the current and future need.

Ninth: Must absolutely stop every activities of cutting, burning, grabbing forest land for ownership after May 7, 2012.  Those who have done this must be sent to court for punishment according to the forest law.  I would like to appeal to all people to plant trees everywhere, especially plant the crop trees on your land of ownership that was measured by the voluntary youth so far in order to contribute to the reduction of climate change and global warming, and I request the competent authorities especially all officials of the Fisheries Administration to cooperate with the Working Groups at the national and sub-national levels and voluntary youths to continue implementing the new activities of old policy on land sector in all provinces-municipalities to be more active.

At the same time, we must continue implementing the order I have recently put out with efficiency on the crackdown of forestry crimes, especially Krog Ngoung wood with highest efficiency.  Also, each concerned technical institution must continue to verify constantly the activities of investment of the companies that have received the economic land concession and signed the contract with the Royal Government in order to ensure the process of investment as well as preventing other passive acts that may occur with regard to this economic land concession.

Rosewood Listed as Endangered Plants
As for the rosewood issue, I have brought it up in the meetings of CLV, CLMV and ACMECS as well. In last March, HE Cham Prasiddh also suggested further measure that the Ministries of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries would write a letter to seek inclusion of rosewood into the list of endangered plants. I already approved the suggestion. Cambodia may not be the place where there are many rosewood but where rosewood transits. They chop them down elsewhere and bring them into Cambodia. With it listed in endangered plant, no one would dare buy it. We need to take this measure as a further step.

Fresh Water Supply Shortage in Preah Sihanoukville
Please allow me to speak a little about the fact that we encountered lack of fresh water supply in the city of Preah Sihanoukville. I have not had a clear indication as to why the problem happened yet. However, I instructed HE Sbaong Sarat, governor of the province, to make effort in channeling fresh water down from the river of Kbal Chhay. I have seen they did it but I still do not have the thorough account why there was this incident that there was shortage of fresh water supply to the city. I do not know whether the Preah Sihanouk Water Headquarters does not want to purchase water from Kbal Chhay or what. I think the Ministry of Industry, Mines and Energy who is responsible in this issue should conduct a study. However, I would have your attention on the source of fresh and clean water.

It is not only the case of the city of Preah Sihanouk. Wood is a major problem. In fact, there would not be shortage of water. But it happened. What remains to resolve is that those who have land in the area must make further efforts, if they do not use their land for industrial purpose, to grown long-term crops to increase more green coverage, which we hope will attract more rain, prevent land erosion and wash-off, while protecting the sea from encroaching upon mainland. This should be an issue of attention and consideration for all not just Preah Sihanouk city. It should not have happened. I instructed the ANCO Company to extent its pipe to the city. It took a week. Why so long and who was responsible? Is it not because they did not want to buy water from the Company and continue to resolve the problem with limited resources?

Re-grow Forest in the Kbal Chhay Area
I would urge our people to make further effort to grow long-term crop like rubber or others that will be there for a long time and attract rain as well. The Forest Administration must cooperate with concerned sectors and development partners, the private sector included, especially the ANCO Company, to restore the depleted forestland in Kbal Chhay and re-grow long-term trees in the natural forest in place of short-term trees. We have to take serious measures to take care of the Kbal Chhay water reservoir to keep water for the city. We cannot afford to allow that happen since the Preah Sihanouk province is the second economic pole of the country. We have here industry, service, seaport, etc.

The provincial authority of Preah Sihanouk province must take every measure to prevent land claiming and reinforce natural resource management in accordance with the order already issued. We should not resort to water from underground. I also instructed the project manager of Koh Puos development to run a water pipe from the source of the city and not to take water from underground. From where do we take the water to Koh Puos? It will be from Kbal Chhay. I find it hard to understand when the Khmer New Year approached we had this fresh water shortage problem.

CPP Lacks Human Resource?
There have been some comments that the Cambodian People’s Party is lacking human resource to be a candidate for the post of Prime Minister. I wish to elaborate a bit in response to that. I think they have gone a bit to the extreme. The other day they said I could only be a primary school teacher. I accept that. Right before the Khmer New Year, they said the Cambodian People’s Party is short of candidate for the post of Prime Minister because there has been only one man for it. I would call the person my junior brother, though he may be about my age, a bit older or younger. What is the most important is that the person used to come asking me for advices in 2006-2007 on whether he should create a Party or go on to be NGO.

As far as this matter is concerned, the ‘younger brother’ should not be too obtuse. In politics, if the Cambodian People’s Party is proposing incapable man to the post, it is rewarding you because you will be able to bewilder him. He used to come for advice from this Primary School teacher. I now continue to advise him that if the Cambodian People’s Party proposes incapable candidate for the elections, you should be happy because he may not get elected. Why should you cry fool about that? It is so obtuse that you let it out. How can you win the elections? If Hun Sen is not a capable candidate and the CPP run his candidacy for the elections, you should let the CPP do that because it will be at your advantage.

There is one point that I want to share with everyone that with Hun Sen in power, everyone – those who scold or appreciate – can live together. In 2008, they said (if they get elected) all commune heads will go to jail and on last 17 April they said they would bring the leaders of the Royal Government to trial. In 1998, another story not to forget, they call for the US to fire missile into my house in Takhmao. All these are what they wish to do even when they do not have power. What would they really do when they have power?

In February and March 1975, no one knew if it was Pol Pot or anyone in the National United Front but they appealed that they would bring Lon Nol, Sirik Matak, Cheng Heng, In Tam, Sostene to trial. They did. The whole country turned into a genocidal regime. You may think if Hun Sen order (police head General) Net Savoeun to encircle and arrest leaders of the opposition, he would do it right away. Did Hun Sen do that? They talked about the great demonstration but there were about 1,000 people joining them…

Once again, I would like to highly appreciate and commend the management and officials of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, who have put efforts in actively contributing with high responsibility to build achievements in the sector of agriculture, forestry and fisheries, and I would like you all to continue this good tradition in order to overcome all obstacles and achieve success based on the set vision.  Along with that, I would like to appeal to all related ministries-institutions, sub-national administration, armed forces, development partners, national and international organizations, private sector and community to continue participating in all forms to assist our farmers and national agriculture development to be further progressed with pride, especially the integration in the context of globalization and participation in building ASEAN Community by 2015.

Before ending, I would like to once again appeal to Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, lecturers and students and all participants to be more active in implementing the key points raised, as well as trying to share information, knowledge and experiences gained from this conference to officials, staffs, colleagues for the improvement of working implementation and duties in their respective sub-sectors so that we can achieve additional new achievements according to our National Agriculture Development Strategy.

At the end, along with the Closing of the Annual Conference of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries 2012-2013, and Direction Setting 2013-2014, and the Official Inauguration of an Academic Building now, I would like to wish Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, lecturers, students, and all participants the four gems of Buddhist blessing: Longevity, Nobility, Health, and Strength./.